![]() |
![]() |
| Home ---------------------News Update ------------------------------------------Contact Us | |
|
The saga of the Vodafone mast started early in 2006, when a few residents were informed that a mast would be sited on Council land outside the Red Lion Public House. This is a third generation base station (3G) designed to carry data rather than voice calls. A petition and individual objections were sent to the Council, but the planning committee raised no objections and gave the green light to the project. The Residents' Association was unaware of what was happening, but quickly formed an action committee when the facts were known.
Action to stop this development was considered necessary due to the irresponsible siting of the mast:
A campaign of awareness was started in May, with a protest outside the Red Lion. There followed an unproductive meeting with Vodafone, when the CRA demanded that the mast be sited outside sensitive areas. They claimed that this was not possible and said they would go ahead as planned. Further protests followed - outside the Junior School, a march from Shelton Lock (where Vodafone want to erect a mast close to the War Memorial) to the Red Lion and a family funday/barbecue. Approximately 300 people signed the petitions saying that 3G was not wanted or needed in Chellaston - but still Vodafone didn't listen. WHY DID WE OBJECT? Because the health implications of base stations remain unclear. Until the all clear is given, they should not be sited in sensitive areas. It is the well being of our children, in particular, that is being sacrificed for profit by the multi-national corporations. Remember asbestos, BSE, tobacco? Those living close to masts have reported sleep disruption, severe levels of tiredness, frequent headaches, nosebleeds, skin problems, a general run down feeling, depression, irritability, behavioural problems, problems at school and epileptic attacks. Reports have emerged of clusters of cancer being linked to the presence of mobile phone base stations. It is believed that with 3G technology, operating at higher frequencies, this will just become worse. In addition, house prices within 250m of an installation could fall. Searches are now detailing masts within this radius of a property. Indeed, a chartered surveyor has recently said that when the house-buyers pack is introduced, this will have to be declared and a reduction in prices will be seen over the next few years. Follow the links and make up your own mind. Ask yourself if you really want to download films and music or watch television on your mobile. Resist the temptation to buy, or refuse the offer of, a 3G phone. Remember that it could cost you and your children dearly in the future. Mast Sanity have a wealth of information on their site: www.mastsanity.org If you don't have time to browse their website, please look at the following:
NEW The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), an arm of the World Health Organization (WHO), has declared after a review of the research that cell phones are possible cancer-causing agents. Professor Dariusz Leszczynski, of the Radiation and Nuclear Safety Authority in Finland, explains why this should probably be considered big news:
Camilla Rees of ElectromagneticHealth.org says,
Vodafone have sought to vary their licence to double the output
power of their 3G masts. The regulator, OFCOM, has obligingly
suggested that all operators should be allowed to quadruple
their power output
at a time when other countries are reducing their exposure
limits. This is yet another case of a so called regulator looking
after the interests of multinationals rather than the general public
UPDATE:
Unsurprisingly, OFCOM have agreed to allow 3G operators to double the
power output of their base stations.
Presumably these decision
makers do not have masts on their doorstep. Meanwhile, further evidence
of health effects
from the International Journal of
Occupational and Environmental Health:
The European Parliament adopted a report on 2nd April 2009 calling for stricter regulation and protection for residents and consumers from electromagnetic emitting devices (mobile phones, masts, Wi-Fi etc). This report was adopted by 559 MEPs, with 22 against and 8 abstentions. It calls for masts to be sited away from schools, nurseries, retirement homes and healthcare institutions. This precisely reflects the concerns of the Association that we have been advocating for the last three years. Read the press report of the European Parliament here. If the phone companies don't like the evidence presented to them, they keep it quiet:
Vodafone agreed to fund an independent survey of emissions from all cellular operators' stations in and around the Junior School on Maple Drive. This was carried out by RFI Global Services Ltd on 14th June 2006 in conjunction with the Residents' Association. Results show that levels are well within the ICNIRP guidelines. Highest readings were to be found on the corner of Maple Drive and Derby Road, with Orange (see below) being the main contributor to the emission level. Readings were low at the school, both inside and outside. It is believed that this may be due to screening from trees located between the masts and school. However, this does not mean that we are being complacent. Vodafone agreed that they would provide round the clock monitoring in the area, but Derby City Council refused to enter into an agreement with Vodafone to put the results on their website. We also approached Derby University with a view to them displaying the results on their environmental website. Despite meetings and subsequent phone calls, they refused to commit themselves. Approaches to environmental consulting companies were also fruitless. Hence we have not been able to progress with this project. One has to ask the question why these people will not work with Vodafone.
For a graph showing the emissions levels
click here.
The survey measured all emissions within the 80 to 3000MHz band.
However, for clarity, only the cellular operator frequencies are shown.
The full report can be viewed by contacting the
webmaster. ORANGE AND O2 Vodafone are
not alone in siting their masts inappropriately. Orange now
admit that their mast at the junction
of Parkway and Derby Road has been
converted to 2G AND 3G, this is despite assurances from them
that this was not the case. Also the 2G power output has
been DOUBLED, even though this is a short mast, giving rise to high
local emissions. Since this is adjacent to the Vodafone mast,
there are grave concerns regarding the cumulative effect, given that
this site is so close to the primary school etc. Update:
Reference to OFCOM's Sitefinder has revealed that O2 have added 3G
antennae to the silo installation. Hence, this installation, in
the centre of a built up area, close to the infants school, now emits
both 2G and 3G radiation. So much for working with the community.
These companies go out of their way to keep the community in the dark
and blatantly ignore the planning process. Telecoms
operators have in the past claimed that they have nothing to hide, so
why do they ignore requests for information? In addition
they modify their equipment without going through the planning
application process. They appear to side step this requirement, even though
from this explanation, it would appear to be a legal requirement: "If
the mast in question does not exceed 15 metres in height (excluding
antennae) any alteration comes under the provisions of Part 24 of the
General Permitted Development Order. This statutory instrument
says quite specifically that the prior approval process must be
followed in the event of "the installation, alteration or replacement
of any telecommunications apparatus". Upgrading from 2G to 3G or
adding 3G must entail either installation, alteration or replacement,
or a combination of the same. Thus, a determination on prior approval
should be sought from the Local Planning Authority - which requires an
application, advertising of the proposal by local newspaper and site
notice, and the opportunity for members of the public to submit
objections. If a 'reasonable number' of objections are forthcoming
then prior approval is required and an associated decision on
whether to give it must be made." Orange claim that the
conversion to 3G is only a minor modification and hence does not have
to go through the Local Planning Authority procedure.
Apparently, a letter was sent to the council in May advising them that
this minor modification was to be carried out. The
reference to 'minor' modification is absurd, since another
transmission system has been installed in addition to the original.
So why don't the authorities pick up on it?
And another WHY?..........
The insurers of telecom companies will not insure them against the
possibility of ill health to the general population from phone mast
radiation. Insurers appear to know something that the telecoms
people want to keep from us.
*****************************
T-MOBILE
T-Mobile has
erected a 15m high 'cypress tree' installation adjacent to the canal
footpath, off Sinfin Lane. This follows two failed attempts to
erect a mast in Shelton Lock.
Chellaston Residents' Association would like to make it clear that it
is not 'anti-mast'. It recognises the need for these
installations, but believes that inappropriate siting is unacceptable
when alternatives are available. This is in line with
recommendations made by the All Party Mobile Group in July 2004.
Recommendation 13 said:
"We recommend that until much more detailed and
scientifically robust information on any health effects from the use
of mobile phone technologies becomes available, the precautionary
approach be adopted when discussing and allowing for the siting and
location of masts in line with Sir William Stewart's recommendations
in the IEGMP Report of 2000 and this be reflected in a revised PPG8"
Unfortunately, the Government decided to ignore the majority of this
expert group's recommendations, including this one. For more on masts in Chellaston
click here
If you cannot view the pdf. files load
Adobe
Reader from their website free of charge |
||||