Home ---------------------News Update ------------------------------------------Contact Us
 

 

The Committee

Chairman's Corner

News, Notices and Current Issues

Police News

Neighbourhood Forum

Arriva Bus Timetables

Comment

Recreation Ground

Chellaston School

Business Park/T12

SPD

Useful Contact Numbers


THE VODAFONE MAST

Voda Mast

The saga of the Vodafone mast started early in 2006, when a few residents were informed that a mast would be sited on Council land outside the Red Lion Public House.  This is a third generation base station (3G) designed to carry data rather than voice calls.  A petition and individual objections were sent to the Council, but the planning committee raised no objections and gave the green light to the project.  The Residents' Association was unaware of what was happening, but quickly formed an action committee when the facts were known. 

 

Action to stop this development was considered necessary due to the irresponsible siting of the mast:

  • 120 metres from the Junior School

  • 200 metres from the Infants' School

  • 100 metres from a nursery

  • Surrounded primarily by elderly persons' residences

  • In the middle of the residential area

A campaign of awareness was started in May, with a protest outside the Red Lion.  There followed an unproductive meeting with Vodafone, when the CRA demanded that the mast be sited outside sensitive areas.  They claimed that this was not possible and said they would go ahead as planned.  Further protests followed - outside the Junior School, a march from Shelton Lock (where Vodafone want to erect a mast close to the War Memorial) to the Red Lion and a family funday/barbecue.  Approximately 300 people signed the petitions saying that 3G was not wanted or needed in Chellaston - but still Vodafone didn't listen.

WHY DID WE OBJECT?

Because the health implications of base stations remain unclear.  Until the all clear is given, they should not be sited in sensitive areas.  It is the well being of our children, in particular, that is being sacrificed for profit by the multi-national corporations.  Remember asbestos, BSE, tobacco?

Those living close to masts have reported sleep disruption, severe levels of tiredness, frequent headaches, nosebleeds, skin problems, a general run down feeling, depression, irritability, behavioural problems, problems at school and epileptic attacks.  Reports have emerged of clusters of cancer being linked to the presence of mobile phone base stations.  It is believed that with 3G technology, operating at higher frequencies, this will just become worse.

In addition, house prices within 250m of an installation could fall.  Searches are now detailing masts within this radius of a property.  Indeed, a chartered surveyor has recently said that when the house-buyers pack is introduced, this will have to be declared and a reduction in prices will be seen over the next few years.

Follow the links and make up your own mind.  Ask yourself if you really want to download films and music or watch television on your mobile.  Resist the temptation to buy, or refuse the offer of, a 3G phone.  Remember that it could cost you and your children dearly in the future. 

Mast Sanity have a wealth of information on their site: www.mastsanity.org

If you don't have time to browse their website, please look at the following:

  • Information note from the Association  Click here

  • Scientific study over 10 years indicating a 3 fold risk of developing new cancers if living within 400m of a mast (pdf file) Click here

  • An appeal from German doctors to recognise that mobile phone installations are resulting in effects that are difficult to alleviate Click here

NEW Vodafone have sought to vary their licence to double the output power of their 3G masts. The regulator, OFCOM, has obligingly suggested that all operators should be allowed to quadruple their power output at a time when  other countries are reducing their exposure limits. This is yet another case of a so called regulator looking after the interests of multinationals rather than the general public
Vodafone has told Ofcom that permitting a higher maximum licensed power would enable it (and other operators) to optimise their networks allowing the flexibility to serve more effectively a wider area and community with better in-building penetration”
There is no real need for it, this is purely commercially driven to take on BT and Virgin Media. Particularly considering the advised 'Precautionary Approach' and the accompanying adverse health effects from microwave radiation, this increase is totally unwarranted and unwelcome.

 The European Parliament adopted a report on 2nd April 2009 calling for stricter regulation and protection for residents and consumers from electromagnetic emitting devices (mobile phones, masts, Wi-Fi etc).  This report was adopted by 559 MEPs, with 22 against and 8 abstentions. It calls for masts to be sited away from schools, nurseries, retirement homes and healthcare institutions.  This precisely reflects the concerns of the Association that we have been advocating for the last three years.  Read the press report of the European Parliament here.

 If the phone companies don't like the evidence presented to them, they keep it quiet:

 

T-MOBILE, the mobile phone giant, has been accused of “burying” a scientific report it commissioned that concluded handsets and masts contribute to cancer and genetic damage. The report argued that officially recommended limits on radiation exposure should be cut to 1/1000th of those now in force. Read Report Here

Also, a recent report in the Lancet criticizes the World Health Organisation for neglecting scientific evidence.  (The telecoms companies always quote the WHO when saying that they believe their systems do not contribute to ill health)

And....if this report in the Independent on Sunday is to believed, then the government may be reviewing the planning rules for masts.....but don't hold your breath!

 

MONITORING

Vodafone agreed to fund an independent survey of emissions from all cellular operators' stations in and around the Junior School on Maple Drive.  This was carried out by RFI Global Services Ltd on 14th June 2006 in conjunction with the Residents' Association.  Results show that levels are well within the ICNIRP guidelines.  Highest readings were to be found on the corner of Maple Drive and Derby Road, with Orange (see below) being the main contributor to the emission level.  Readings were low at the school, both inside and outside.  It is believed that this may be due to screening from trees located between the masts and school.  However, this does not mean that we are being complacent.  Vodafone agreed  that they would provide round the clock monitoring in the area, but Derby City Council refused to enter into an agreement with Vodafone to put the results on their website.  We also approached Derby University with a view to them displaying  the results on their environmental website.  Despite meetings and subsequent phone calls, they refused to commit themselves.  Approaches to environmental consulting companies were also fruitless.  Hence we have not been able to progress with this project.  One has to ask the question why these people will not work with Vodafone.

For a graph showing the emissions levels click here.  The survey measured all emissions within the 80 to 3000MHz band.  However, for clarity, only the cellular operator frequencies are shown.  The full report can be viewed by contacting the webmaster.

 

ORANGE AND O2

Vodafone are not alone in siting their masts inappropriately.  Orange now admit that their mast at the junction of Parkway and Derby Road has been converted to 2G AND 3G, this is despite assurances from them  that this was not the case.  Also the 2G power output has been DOUBLED, even though this is a short mast, giving rise to high local emissions.  Since this is adjacent to the Vodafone mast, there are grave concerns regarding the cumulative effect, given that this site is so close to the primary school etc.

We have approached O2 regarding their installation on the grain silo on the High Street. Following a great deal of activity on the site we asked O2 what modifications have been made. 

They have not replied, even after two reminders.  We ask why?

Update:  Reference to OFCOM's Sitefinder has revealed that O2 have added 3G antennae to the silo installation.  Hence, this installation, in the centre of a built up area, close to the infants school, now emits both 2G and 3G radiation.  So much for working with the community.  These companies go out of their way to keep the community in the dark and blatantly ignore the planning process.

Telecoms operators have in the past claimed that they have nothing to hide, so why do they ignore requests for information?  In addition they modify their equipment without going through the planning application process.  They appear to side step this requirement, even though from this explanation, it would appear to be a legal requirement:

"If the mast in question does not exceed 15 metres in height (excluding antennae) any alteration comes under the provisions of Part 24 of the General Permitted Development Order.  This statutory instrument says quite specifically that the prior approval process must be followed in the event of "the installation, alteration or replacement of any telecommunications apparatus".  Upgrading from 2G to 3G or adding 3G must entail either installation, alteration or replacement, or a combination of the same.  Thus, a determination on prior approval should be sought from the Local Planning Authority - which requires an application, advertising of the proposal by local newspaper and site notice, and the opportunity for members of the public to submit objections.  If a 'reasonable number' of objections are forthcoming then prior approval is required and an associated decision on whether to give it must be made."

Orange claim that the conversion to 3G is only a minor modification and hence does not have to go through the Local Planning Authority procedure.  Apparently, a letter was sent to the council in May advising them that this minor modification was to be carried out.  The reference to 'minor' modification is absurd, since another transmission system has been installed in addition to the original.  So why don't the authorities pick up on it?

And another WHY?..........

The insurers of telecom companies will not insure them against the possibility of ill health to the general population from phone mast radiation.  Insurers appear to know something that the telecoms people want to keep from us.

 

*****************************

T-MOBILE

T-Mobile has erected a 15m high 'cypress tree' installation adjacent to the canal footpath, off Sinfin Lane.  This follows two failed attempts to erect a mast in Shelton Lock. 


*****************************
 

Chellaston Residents' Association would like to make it clear that it is not 'anti-mast'.  It recognises the need for these installations, but believes that inappropriate siting is unacceptable when alternatives are available.  This is in line with recommendations made by the All Party Mobile Group in July 2004.  Recommendation 13 said:

"We recommend that until much more detailed and scientifically robust information on any health effects from the use of mobile phone technologies becomes available, the precautionary approach be adopted when discussing and allowing for the siting and location of masts in line with Sir William Stewart's recommendations in the IEGMP Report of 2000 and this be reflected in a revised PPG8"

Unfortunately, the Government decided to ignore the majority of this expert group's recommendations, including this one.

 

For more on masts in Chellaston click here

If you cannot view the pdf. files load Adobe Reader from their website free of charge